Main

Best Practices Catalogue

Areas of Injury Prevention > Motor Vehicle and Other Road Vehicle Related Injuries
Targeted Age > Lifespan

Bicycle Helmets: Educational and Legislative Interventions
to Increase Use in Victoria, Australia

 

Background

  

  

Program Goals:

An integrated approach to increasing bicycle helmet use to reduce the severity of injury in the case of cycling mishaps

Intent:

Unintentional

  

Risk Factors Addressed:

Head injuries account for the majority and the most severe of bicycle-related injury

  

Place of occurrence:

Community

  

Age/Age Range:

All cyclists, with special attention focused upon children and adolescents

Resources

  

  

Year Developed:

Broad legislation requiring cyclists to wear approved safety helmet introduced in 1990, following a decade of promotional efforts

  

Collaborative Organization(s):

Developed and implemented by Victorian Road Traffic Authority (VicRoads)
Police and emergency services 

  

Funding Resource(s):

Major public funding supplemented by various types of private support, including funding;
Early creation of steering committee of experts, stakeholders and other interests 

Implementation

  

  

Context/Setting:

Community

  

Strategies Used:

Evaluation, Education, Engineering, Enactment

  

Activities Used:

Likely benefited from earlier and concurrent injury-prevention campaigns, research and developments (e.g. motorcycle helmets; drink-driving; helmet engineering;
Combines educational and legislative approaches;
Helmet rebate schemes highly effective;
Dissemination via mass media, private sector, school systems 

  

Program Evaluation:

Uses ongoing injury-surveillance data to assess impact of initiative
Data collected and analyzed by university and public research interests 

  

Source of Best Practice:

Volpe, R., Lewko, J., & Battra, A. (2002). A Compendium of Effective, Evidence-Based Best Practices in Prevention of Neurotrauma. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

  

Original Source:

SMARTRISK. (1998). The economic burden of unintentional injury in Canada. Toronto.

  

Supplementary Material:

N/A

  

Local Example(s):

N/A

  

Contact Information:           

Max H. Cameron
Senior Research Fellow
Monash University Accident Research Centre
Melbourne, Victoria
Australia
Tel: 61 3 9905 4373
Fax: 61 3 9905 4363
Max.cameron@general.monash.edu.au

  

Notes:  

  

Outcomes

  

  

Long-term outcomes/Effectiveness:

Legislation appears to have reduced number of cyclists

 

  

Short-term outcomes:

Dramatic increase in helmet wearing rates;
Corresponding reduction in head injuries to cyclists 

Other

  

  

Date of Review:

2000

  

Classification:

Best Practice

References

Henderson, M. (1995). The effectiveness of bicycle helmets: A review (Rev. ed.) [prepared for the Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales, Australia]. Retrieved March, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.bhsi.org/webdocs/henderso.htm

Morris, B. A., Trimble, N. E., & Fendley, S. J. (1994). Increasing bicycle helmet use in the community: Measuring response to a wide-scale, 2-year effort [Abstract]. Canadian Family Physician, 40, 1126-1131. Retrieved March 12, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.hc‑sc.ca/hppb/socialmarketing/publications/smbib98/kids.htm

Thompson, D. C., Rivara, F. P., & Thompson, R. (1999). Helmets for preventing head and facial injuries in bicyclists (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, 4. Oxford: Update Software

This best practice has been taken from the compendium volumes of best practices in neurotrauma prevention, identified and reviewed by Ontario researchers, with funding from the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF). OIPRC has partnered with the ONF to abstract and web-enable this practice. Please direct inquiries about this best practice to richard.volpe@utoronto.ca.