Areas of Injury Prevention >
Motor Vehicle and Other Road Vehicle Related Injuries
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COMPASS Program (Advanced Traffic Management System ATMS) |
||
|
Background |
|
|
|
|
Program Goals: |
Congestion
reduction; Accident reduction. |
|
|
Intent: |
Unintentional injuries |
|
|
Risk Factors Addressed: |
Traffic management system designed to alleviate recurring and non-recurring traffic congestion resulting in MVCs |
|
|
Place of occurrence: |
Highways |
|
|
Age/Age Range: |
Adults |
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Year Developed: |
mid-1970s, fully operational January 30, 1991 |
|
|
Collaborative Organization(s): |
Ministry of Transportation of the Government of Ontario; the media; Municipalities of the Toronto and Mississauga; various universities (i.e., Engineering at UofT) and various Emergency Services (i.e., Paramedic, Firefighting, Law Enforcement Agencies) |
|
|
Funding Resource(s): |
Ministry of Transportation of the Government of Ontario |
|
|
Costs: |
Initially,
$1 million per kilometre of operation ($16 million) |
|
Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Context/Setting: |
Community |
|
|
Strategies Used: |
Engineering; Education; Economics |
|
|
Activities Used: |
Detector loops embedded in pavement; closed circuit television monitors; inter-agency incident coordination for incident response; media messages relaying incident information to motorists (Changeable Message Signs CMS); data collection component |
|
|
Program Evaluation:
|
Performance analysis measures of effectiveness included incident duration, vehicular delay; secondary accidents; quality of traffic flow; driver responses to visual electronic road messages; Motorist survey |
|
|
Source of Best Practice:
|
Road-related Neurotrauma and Road Safety: Opportunities and
Challenges for Prevention Science.
|
|
|
Original Source: |
Ontario Ministry of Transportation |
|
|
Supplementary Material: |
N/A |
|
|
Local Example(s): |
N/A |
|
|
Contact Information: |
Philip H. Masters, P. Eng. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
|
|
Long-term outcomes/Effectiveness: |
Resource savings in accident costs, travel time costs, vehicle operating costs; Indirect outcomes include reduced air pollution, enhanced data collection and analysis capabilities, research and export potential, future productivity gains |
|
|
Short-term outcomes: |
Quick detection, confirmation and prompt response time to highway incidents - average duration of incident from occurrence to clearance reduced from 86 to 30 minutes. Secondary accidents are reduced with prompt removal of primary incident; Balance of traffic flow during times of congestion; CMS reduce accident and travel times and effectively moderate driver behaviour |
|
|
Cost-Effectiveness: |
Potential worldwide market for ATMS is valued in excess of $50 billion over the next ten years. Manufacturers and consultants in Ontario are key players in the international market as a result of COMPASS. |
|
|
Other Benefits: |
CMS allow for public service announcements (i.e., community awareness for missing children) |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Date of Review: |
2005 |
|
|
Classification: |
Best Practice |
References
Intelligent Transportation Systems Plan for Canada. (1999). En Route to Intelligent Mobility. TP 13501E. Transport Canada: Ottawa, Ontario.
Korpal, P.R., Rayman, C.A., & Masters, P.H. (1994). Evaluation of the Highway 401 Freeway Traffic Management System: summary report. Ministry of Transportation of Ontario: Freeway Traffic Management Section.
Ontario Road Safety Annual Report. (2001). Ministry of Transportation of the Government of Ontario.
| This best practice has been taken from the compendium volumes of best practices in neurotrauma prevention, identified and reviewed by Ontario researchers, with funding from the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF). OIPRC has partnered with the ONF to abstract and web-enable this practice. Please direct inquiries about this best practice to richard.volpe@utoronto.ca. |
|