Areas of Injury Prevention >
Farm and Occupational Related Injuries
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tractor Rollover Protective Structure (ROPS) Rebate Scheme 1997/98 |
||
|
Background |
|
|
|
|
Program Goals: |
In the state of Victoria, Australia: To facilitate the fitment of ROPS to all previously unprotected tractors and to provide information and awareness to farmers to reduce the risk of fatality and severity of injury should a tractor rollover occur |
|
|
Intent: |
Unintentional |
|
|
Risk Factors Addressed: |
Tractor rollover protective structures, with seatbelt use, are designed to protect tractor operators in case of an accidental overturn |
|
|
Place of occurrence: |
Farm |
|
|
Age/Age Range: |
Adult males |
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Year Developed: |
1997 |
|
|
Collaborative Organization(s): |
Funds were provided by the Victorian WorkCover Authority (VWA), participating farmers, and the Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) |
|
|
Funding Resource(s): |
VWA allocated part of their annual state budget as funding for the program |
|
|
Costs: |
Farmers were expected to pay for the ROPS (apr.$500 AU) plus fitment to their tractor (apr $100AU), minus the rebate $150AU. |
|
Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Context/Setting: |
Farm |
|
|
Strategies Used: |
Evaluation, Education, Engineering, Enactment |
|
|
Activities Used: |
combination of regulation, information and awareness programs, and education |
|
|
Program Evaluation: |
Through Monash University Accident Research Centre, the evaluation used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to describe the effect of the program; short- and long-term benefits of the scheme, potential lives saved; psychological trauma averted; general effects on farm safety; and cost outcome analysis |
|
|
Source of Best Practice: |
Volpe, R., Lewko, J., & Battra, A. (2002). A Compendium of Effective, Evidence-Based Best Practices in Prevention of Neurotrauma. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. |
|
|
Original Source: |
Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program (CAISP). (1999). Hospitalized farm injuries in Canada, 1990-1996. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University |
|
|
Supplementary Material: |
|
|
|
Local Example(s): |
N/A |
|
|
Contact Information: |
Dr. Lesley M. Day |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
|
|
Long-term outcomes/Effectiveness: |
General effect on farm safety; |
|
|
Short-term outcomes: |
Demand for ROPS rebates was substantially higher than in any
previous scheme; |
|
|
Other Benefits: |
Potential to save lives and to avert psychological trauma for families of victims |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Date of Review: |
2000 |
|
|
Classification: |
Best Practice |
References
Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program. (1999). Hospitalized farm injuries in Canada, 1990-1996. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University, Author. 999
Day, L. M., & Rechnitzer, G. (1999). Evaluation of the tractor rollover protective structure rebate scheme, 1997/98. Australia: Monash University Accident Research Center
Thelin, A. (1999). Epilogue: Agricultural, occupational and environmental health policy strategies of the future. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 18, 523-526.
| This best practice has been taken from the compendium volumes of best practices in neurotrauma prevention, identified and reviewed by Ontario researchers, with funding from the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF). OIPRC has partnered with the ONF to abstract and web-enable this practice. Please direct inquiries about this best practice to richard.volpe@utoronto.ca. |
|