Main

Best Practices Catalogue

Areas of Injury Prevention > Farm and Occupational Related Injuries
Targeted Age > Adults

Tractor Rollover Protective Structure (ROPS) Rebate Scheme 1997/98

Background

  

  

Program Goals:

In the state of Victoria, Australia: To facilitate the fitment of ROPS to all previously unprotected tractors and to provide information and awareness to farmers to reduce the risk of fatality and severity of injury should a tractor rollover occur

  

Intent:

Unintentional

 

  

Risk Factors Addressed:

Tractor rollover protective structures, with seatbelt use, are designed to protect tractor operators in case of an accidental overturn

  

Place of occurrence:

Farm

  

Age/Age Range:

Adult males

Resources

  

  

Year Developed:

1997

  

Collaborative Organization(s):

Funds were provided by the Victorian WorkCover Authority (VWA), participating farmers, and the Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF)

  

Funding Resource(s):

VWA allocated part of their annual state budget as funding for the program

  

Costs:

Farmers were expected to pay for the ROPS (apr.$500 AU) plus fitment to their tractor (apr $100AU), minus the rebate $150AU.

Implementation

  

  

Context/Setting:

Farm

  

Strategies Used:

Evaluation, Education, Engineering, Enactment

  

Activities Used:

combination of regulation, information and awareness programs, and education

  

Program Evaluation:

Through Monash University Accident Research Centre, the evaluation used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to describe the effect of the program; short- and long-term benefits of the scheme, potential lives saved; psychological trauma averted; general effects on farm safety; and cost outcome analysis

  

Source of Best Practice:

Volpe, R., Lewko, J., & Battra, A. (2002). A Compendium of Effective, Evidence-Based Best Practices in Prevention of Neurotrauma. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

  

Original Source:

Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program (CAISP). (1999). Hospitalized farm injuries in Canada, 1990-1996. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University

  

Supplementary Material:

http://www.general.monash.edu.au/muarc/rptsum/es155.htm

  

Local Example(s):

N/A

  

Contact Information: 

Dr. Lesley M. Day
Senior Research Fellow
Accident Research Centre
Monash University
Clayton, Victoria
3168 Australia
Tel: 61-3-9905-1811
Email: lesley.day@general.monash.edu.au

Outcomes

  

  

Long-term outcomes/Effectiveness:

General effect on farm safety;
Decrease in economic cost 

  

Short-term outcomes:

Demand for ROPS rebates was substantially higher than in any previous scheme;
Penetration of the scheme extended beyond the VFF to include non-members;

  

Other Benefits:

Potential to save lives and to avert psychological trauma for families of victims

Other

  

  

Date of Review:

2000

  

Classification:

Best Practice

References

Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program. (1999). Hospitalized farm injuries in Canada, 1990-1996. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University, Author. 999

Day, L. M., & Rechnitzer, G. (1999).  Evaluation of the tractor rollover protective structure rebate scheme, 1997/98.   Australia: Monash University Accident Research Center

Thelin, A. (1999). Epilogue: Agricultural, occupational and environmental health policy strategies of the future. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 18, 523-526.

This best practice has been taken from the compendium volumes of best practices in neurotrauma prevention, identified and reviewed by Ontario researchers, with funding from the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF). OIPRC has partnered with the ONF to abstract and web-enable this practice. Please direct inquiries about this best practice to richard.volpe@utoronto.ca.