Areas of Injury Prevention > Comprehensive Community Based Prevention Strategies
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Upstate New York Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) Prevention Program |
||
|
Background |
|
|
|
|
Program Goals: |
To provide educational materials about SBS t parents of every new infant in Western New York; to verify parents’ comprehension of the dangers of violent infant shaking; to track the distribution of information through the collection of the returned commitment statements; to evaluate the program’s effect on the regional incidence of SBS |
|
|
Intent: |
Intentional |
|
|
Risk Factors Addressed: |
Lack of knowledge about the harms of shaking a baby |
|
|
Place of occurrence: |
Home environment |
|
|
Age/Age Range: |
Parents and care-givers of newborns |
|
|
Other Population Characteristics: |
Fatigue, frustration, inability to deal with crying infant, lack of knowledge about newborns |
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Year Developed: |
1998 |
|
|
Collaborative Organization(s): |
Children’s
Hospital of Buffalo |
|
|
Funding Resource(s): |
New
York State Office of Children and Family Services |
|
Implementation |
|
|
|
|
Context/Setting: |
Hospitals |
|
|
Strategies Used: |
Education, Enactment |
|
|
Activities Used: |
Hospitals
in different areas phased in over time to a total of 17 counties with
participating hospitals |
|
|
Program Evaluation: |
Dissemination of program materials tracked using the returned commitment statements; the 7- month follow-up calls provide research data on parents’ recollection and retention of program information; clearly defined, quantifiable outcome measures enable program staff to assess the effectiveness of the program in reducing the incidence of inflicted infant head neurotrauma |
|
|
Source of Best Practice: |
Volpe, R. & Lewko, J. (2004). Preventing Neurotrauma: A Casebook of Evidence-Based Practices. Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation. |
|
|
Original Source: |
Caffey, J. (1972). On the theory and practice of shaking infants. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 124 (2), 161-169. |
|
|
Local Example(s): |
Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation Shaken Baby Syndrome Prevention Program |
|
|
Contact Information: |
Dr.
Mark S. Dias |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
|
|
Long-term outcomes/Effectiveness: |
Replication
in Central Pennsylvania |
|
|
Short-term outcomes: |
The average annual incidence of inflicted infant neurotrauma has decreased from 7.0 to 2.2 cases per year Other child abuse statistics suggest that the dramatic and temporal drop in shaken baby syndrome cases in Western New York can be directly attributed to the Shaken Baby Syndrome Education Program |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Date of Review: |
2004 |
|
|
Classification: |
Best Practice |
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Shaken baby syndrome: Rotational cranial injuries – Technical Report. Policy Statement.108 (1), 206-210.
Dias, M.S., Mazur, P., Li, V., Smith, K., deGuehery, K. (2002). Preventing shaken baby syndrome: A hospital based parent education program. Manuscript submitted for publication, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Lithco, G. (2001, Winter). New York passes new SBS law. National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome SBS Quarterly. Retrieved June 29, 2002 from http://www.dontshake.com/quarterly/sbswinter01law.html.
| This best practice has been taken from the compendium volumes of best practices in neurotrauma prevention, identified and reviewed by Ontario researchers, with funding from the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF). OIPRC has partnered with the ONF to abstract and web-enable this practice. Please direct inquiries about this best practice to richard.volpe@utoronto.ca. |
|